Surya's World

Health care - why reform needed?

2010-03-23T15:56:00.000-07:00

Say it a war of ideologies, be it right or left or center. The question is whether Health care should be available all the citizens of a country? In my view, there are 4 fundamental areas any government should create security for its citizens. They are Education, Infrastructure (Roads/transport, clean environment, energy), Peace/military (security and maintain sovereignity) and Public Health. Although capitalist thought says, each of these areas will give better services to its consumers by privitazing - isn't this tantamount to all the "citizens" are considered "consumers"? There-in lies, the balancing act....for certain aspects and conditions, there needs to be social net and governance, for certain, there should not be. For example, how offensive would it appear, if military of a country is privitized? How does the notion "let us hire some mercenaries/pirates when the demand comes (through war) on contract basis, because it saves money and increases performance" sound? Do we really think, even patriotism can be "consumerised"?

Health and wealth have a direct bearing on the happiness of the citizens. Heath care is an unalienable right of the citizens and is fundamental to a successful state. Healthcare is an essential service, every human being needs. Such a care should be available to a wide populance without descrimination. I have noticed an attitude in some doctors in America, their "practice" has become a commercial venture, with only one aim - make profit. Treating patients have become a secondary goal. In India (where I was brought up) medicine used to be considered a noble and self-less profession because of its intrinsic service to humanity (the wealth it creates for the practioner is incidental). Even in the west, contributions are celebrated with the likes of Jonas Salk, Albert Schweitzer, Ronald Ross and numerous others. In general, moral and humane touch to medicine has slowly been eroded with the advent of commercial angle to it....in the name of efficiency and performance. Doctors want to protect the lawsuits on frivolous grounds, insurance companies wants to manage "risk". Who will be the loser in such a set up? If everyone has rights and pursues liberty, can they remain without being selfish?

Since, the world economy is dominated with capitalistic thought, which is leading us on a path of privitizing everything. However, it is only fair that the Healthcare in the US is regulated and reformed, so that the parity is established. Healthcare reform, should not be be considered a redistribution of wealth (although, it is balancing of power); rather it should be considered as taming the greed, which has gone unchecked for decades!!

Nobel's Clarion call

2009-10-09T20:30:00.001-07:00

The fairy tale for President Obama continues......Nobel Prize for Obama.

I am pleased with the honor the president received. After the excitement of this news sunk in, I contemplated on the other Nobel Prize winners : Nelson Mandela, Mother Theresa, Dalai Lama, Martin Luther King, Albert Schweitzer and Norman Borlaug.......they have had lasting impression on many people, who draw inspiration from their work and life time. They left us to cherish ideals of courage to do the right thing, selflessness and an indomitable faith in human spirit.

The image of US is tarnished in the past due to so many aggressive, selfish tactics employed around the world. A soothing touch was desperately the need of the hour. Under these circumstances, came a beacon of Hope in the name of Obama. His skills of oratory, vision of change has inspired people around the world. His courage, vision and inclusiveness are reflected in actions....Some of his bold intentions related to international affairs, particularly, Muslim world in terms of his Cairo's address, Iran engagement, views on Palestinian, Afghanistan (Taliban engagement) etc., The intention is to establish peace, increase the cooperation and tolerance. In this world of divided by Race, religion and economic might, any vision for a different world order will be pre-judged by our parochial view of success. Let us, for a moment, set us aside our propensity to be rational, for the best of intentions may fail.

I do not expect he will succeed in many of the goals he has set himself to do. But, let us also give credit to him for thinking differently and help us all live and work towards loftier goals. The world has become very cynical and materialist with time, we tend to kill "Gandhis in the making" by being skeptical, judgmental and critical....thus slipping further into an abyss of divisiveness.

Obama will be remembered for his moral rectitude rather than the accomplishments of his Presidential term. The goals he has set out to do can not happen in his brief sojourn in the Whitehouse. It is a lifetime of work......or better yet, it is not even "his " work, but, work of all people of the world. That is a fine legacy!!

Our world is made of with many challenges that will threaten our very own survival : Global warming, energy crisis, world peace and nuclear proliferation. As predicted before elected, he is turning out to be a fine statesman. Obama now has to transcend his position; the call is now, for a noble self.

The message is also clear to rest of the people in the world - Be nobler!!

The Alchemistry of Spiritual ignorance

2009-09-24T02:50:00.000-07:00

After having heard a lot, and a high recommendation of my niece, who fell in love with this book, I read laboriously through the 167 pages of this best seller which sold 65 Million copies. I know, I will be cursed by several of Coelho's admirers for writing this blog.

Although, I do not have any pretension of knowing the subtleties of allegorical writing, ignorant of profound meanings of spiritualism, oblivious to the deeper meanings of this book; My simple mind found this book utterly lacking in some sensibilities that are considered as 'civility' in the society. I would not disagree with the axiomatic premise of "follow your own heart", but, follow it...with a fatalist attitude - Maktub??? No proponent of "free will" would subscribe to this oxymoronic, paradoxical, contradicting spiritual point of view. Its stultifyingly absurd story to be narrated as a fable, where all the events are serendipitous ("nature conspiring for our protogonist's success").

But now, having made such outrageous remarks, and having an opinion contrary to a zillion people; gets me in an awkward situation. Coelho alludes the following ( some observations that have made me feel queasy).....

1. Let me follow my 'personal legend" at the expense of love, to get my material benefit.....
2. Believe that somehow, if I wish for something and follow my dream, the universe will conspire me to succeed. I do believe, following your heart with a commitment for a noble purpose, will open the doors of opportunity......
3. Be a sexist. Let the woman I love sacrifice everything...while I pursure my own selfish goal!!
4. Alchemy??? Ability of a person to talk to fundamental elements of nature? No matter what the spiritual advancement of an individual, the fundamental nature of these elements can not be altered. Simply because, I believe, spiritualism is a matter of heart/mind and has a different dimension. The manifestation of it can not be in the physical plane......Even Jesus Christ and Mohammad Prophet can not lay claims to such miracles...and they did not!
5. Follow the signs?? How do we follow the signs? Big Spiritual humbug.

6. Divisiveness......disregard the religious sentiments of arabian land to consume wine? It is utterly disrespectful, even it is done by an alchemist.

It baffles me to no end, about the popularity of this book. May be I am missing something....big time!! I felt, if someone needs spiritual enlightenment, study a Bible, a Koran or a Bhagavadgita......and not the escapist, psuedo-spiritual routes shown by new age book like this.

Magadheera : From Great to Good

2009-08-29T23:16:00.000-07:00

Movies can influence culture, grab talk time and command mindshare. Telugu Cinema has seen two extravagant movies, studded with special effect and visual splendour; this year. Arundhati, a gory thriller and Magadheera, a story with "transcendence of love" theme with an intriguing script. Magadheera had potential to be a classic and a great movie, but for its compromise on some commercial pay-offs (producer's objective). In an attempt to ensure ROI, film makers have just lost an opportunity to make a great movie.

Is this a great Movie?

A great movie is flawless (both in story line and form), great acting, high artistic values, delightful, entertaining with an uplifting message. Magadheera is a good movie, because of the balancing act the crew did despite posturing and hoodwinking....but, it is skillful, clever and ingenious. Even the exposure of skin and mid-riff of the romantic interest of the protogonist appeared natural, looked tasteful, classy, yet achieve what audiences expect to see in commercial cinema. One of the rarities in this movie is creating proper context and interweaving several themes, following and closing threads that arised during the narration. Lyrical gymnastics, musical harmony and the appropriate translation on the screen is a master stroke! Although, the movies (stories) that deal with mixing things in the realm of rebirth and occult may have many logical errors, to a large extent, they were minimized.

Histrionics of both the protagonists is very apt, chemistry rightly achieved, expressions appropriate, sensual and finely blended. Ability to show expressions of anger, love, kindness, pathos, naughtiness, longing were very delicately handled and subtly acted. This is different than the "crass acting", usually seen in telugu movies. Unfortunately, Kajal did not get enough mileage as she deserves more than what she currently credited for! Charan's skills were tested at various places. But, for me, he stood tall in the episode, where he sacrifices his love at the behest of king's request ("fealty with love"). Its interesting to check his body language....all through the movie, he makes his body do the talking!

This movie would have become a classic but for some sequences that have diminished the stature of this film. Inclusion of these episodes made this film a good one instead of a great one. Some ineffective commercial pay-offs are :
1. Eight planetary alignment (sub-plot) is irrelevant to the storyline and it did not help the story narration...in anyway.
2. Entire Chiranjeevi's episode (play it to the garallies) is a cheap gimmick.
3. Brahmanandam's comedy scenes are in a very poor taste.
4. Entire Solomon's role is weak. Share Khan neither had a strong motive nor a passion to be reborn. A stronger motive should have been established well in the narrative. Have all other royal family members are reborn?

The Contrast :

The story is Contrasting and juxtaposition is dramatic and artistic. Although, there is inspiration from LOTR, 300 etc., the collage is not easy. It was finely thought through. This movie has several patterns and works at different levels - and works for mass to class markets and appeals to the most discerning of audiences.....Here are some themes I noticed :

Harsha Vs Kalabhairava : We will notice several character flaws in the Harha's character and near flawless Kalabhairava's character. This is very contrasting (very intentional)....and shows the control of the director on the narration (and a clever screen play). Some of the flaws projected with Harsha's character are his admittance of affairs (innuendo), unnecessarily provoking the antagonist, recklessness and lack of control of anger eading to death of Indu's father). WoW! It is gutsy to portray a protagonist that way!

Girl vs. Boy : Princess pursuing bodyguard (girl seeking heart) vs. Rider pursuing a lovely girl ( boy seeking heart).

Past Vs. Present : Be it honor or values.....you will see the script/story writer jumping in and making commentary through Charan's dialogues.

Sawaal-Jawaab Panchadaara Bomma is a classic case of challenge and response. The lyrics are in Jugal bandis style (where two individual players of different competencies, coming together to produce a fantastic piece of music). These can be seen all through the movie : flower and sword, woman and Lion (art pieces in the udaygargh fort!), Suvana Hriya, Dilemma's vs. Duty, Love vs sacrifice. Good vs Evil, Contridiction vs Decisiveness, Cruety vs Fealty (even a crusader chages his heart, Share Khan appreciating the valor and courage of Kalabhairava) etc., You will notice the difference in music and lyrics as well - traditional vs contemporary. It is an admirable job to create such a script and achieve a harmony of the themes both in form and in content.

Logical problems:

Is Ranadev Billa evil?
The moment we come across Ranadev Billa 's character, we perceive him negatively. Why? Let us list down what he has done :
1. Throws his javaline (in the introduction shot).
2. Expresses his desire for the princess. And why not? Although, this behavior is inappropriate, it is only, his woman. He would have the "right" to marry her. Forget the individual preferences of women 400 years ago. Those were the times, when Rajaram Mohun Roy was not yet born!
3. He dislikes our hero (so, we dislike him?). That is alright, our hero is not an ajathu sethru....right? That too when, he keeps tasting all the food items like Sabari.....before him in the pretext of protection! "C'mon Kalabhairava.....audience might like it, I dont"
4. His ideology is "I win/ you lose". He just says it. How many of us are any different?
5. He wears a disgusting mask...we don't like. (I think he hasn't considered the popularity survey results??).

He did not commit any offence against the state or his land.....and I believe he asked the right question about the rule of the kingdom, because he was not being heeded, all along. The punishment for asking the right question is extradition and that too, decided by a princess (who has no governing authority?).

Ranadev Billa is not evil, but a selfish man with no control on his desires. He is also foolish. But, why did we all feel he is evil? Beware, the mind trick by the director! Raghuveer is shown in the first half and as a lecher, murderer and a egoist monster. That is when the image of an actor/character is established with audience. When a character of the same actor reappears, 400 years earlier, our mind will perceive negativity (residual baggage attributed to that actor) , even if the character doesn't do all that negative :-)

Foolishness of Billa
1. After sensing the flirting of Mitravinda and Kalabhairava, he would not have the a beautiful princess ( his would-be) run into a body-guard. He will not let attracted, prime-aged opposite genders flirting and having fun at his expense. The risk is too much - one, losing the beautiful proncess, two, losing the kingdom as a result.
2. He should not have had this issue hanging in the air for too long. The betrothal must have happened way before ( a stitch in time, saves nine).

Our minds will not think this, because, we are shown the movie from only princess/kalabhairava's perspective and the romance is so enticing!

Foolish King :
Ignorance of the king not to plan for the battle even if he knows Share Khan is awaiting to capture the fort. His foolishness is displayed (the foolish kings/rulers are always our bane?):

1. Holding competitions rather than strategizing the safety of the citizens :-). There a threat looming large and Share Khan ready to lay sieze. In the middle of all this, the competition!! The succession discussion is not waranted at this time. Ranadev Billa is both angry and disgusted because, there was no succession plan by the king

2. Listening to a Raj guru's suggestions. This is the least/last the king can do (listening to a spiritual solution for a military problem). Particularly, when the Rajguru doesn't even know the extent of the threat that is looming (Noticed Rajguru enquiring about who Share Khan is?) Is it what a King does for an issue concerning national secuity?

3. A man capable of killing 100 well trained soldiers should be in the army and not as a body guard (is misallocation of resources). Just imagine the taxes those people are paying for the misrule of the king!!
4. Letting go of a Army general, when he is facing a war! The king hasn't read Ramayana, perhaps and particularly about Ravana and Vibhishana.....I thought Ramayana is 2000 years old!

Improbable Alliance :
Share Khan is powerful and doesn't need the Ranadev Billa to conquer Udaygargh. He need not have an alliance of any kind. This is just a ploy to weaken the antagonists' character.

The real Kalabhairava :

1. Beheading heads of the statues (don't know which sculptor/king would agree to it) in the initial scene is to establish his Valor.
2. Narration of the history of his clan by the minister, Man Singh of Share Khan ( which is only notional at that time).
3. Negative dimension to his character is his flirting with Princess, although he is a body gaurd. That behavior is unethical. And actually thinking that he can marry her! So, there is no need of sacrifice....Actually, he should have warned the lady that their love is "improbable".

All in all, this is a character appears that appears loftier (but has opportunist overtones).

I had my own wishlist after seeing the movie........
1. The comedy should have been more effective had it been a couple of "hide-n-seek" and 'cat and mouse" with Harsha and Indu and coincidental humor thereof... instead of using traditional comedy fare.

2. In the DVD version, I would expect alternative endings ( asking too much?). Had I been directing this film, I would make a small change in the ending. I would have borrowed "Cliffhanger"...which would be fitting for this movie of irony, coincidence and constrast. Since, in the first life, kalabhairava could not hold hands, in the modern life, Indu almost falls off the cliff, Harsha holds her hands dramatically, and saves her!
3. Need an extended cut in DVD...I can't get enough of this movie :-)
This movie is not set up for either a pre-quel or a sequel. We just lost an opportunity to churn out a big franchise.

Arundhati: Triumph of Form over Content

2009-01-31T22:23:00.000-08:00

After hearing rave reviews, word of mouth and several discussions in the cafeteria about the movie, I was so tempted to watch it in a hurry. I got tickets in a Premier theatre using my "influence". Then I watched....not once, but twice! I have tremendously enjoyed every moment; both times.

Arundhati is gripping, smart, intelligent, tacky! Anushka's best performance and I doubt, if she can ever beat this ever again. But, one such role is enough in a lifetime! She is Majestic as Jejemma and a very contrasting, diffident Arundhati. Ravi Shankar who dubbed for Sanu Sood's Character of Pasupati/Aghora is easily recognizable best dubbing effort. Without a doubt, this movie will be a milestone in Tollywood. Clever direction, deft editing, jaw dropping special affects (by far the best in Indian cinema) and exceptional production values will earn this movie a permanent place in Tollywood history. I was told it is going to be a guaranteed all time grosser. Blockbuster, no doubt! There is no denying, why the movie did so well.....umpteen people have written, gossiped about it already. I can easily visualize many awards for these efforts.

Leaving alone the hype, I have this uneasy feeling after my second viewing. I wanted to share with you some of my observations. Sometimes, we may revel in fun, not knowing if it is good for us or not. For example, smoking is fun, we may enjoy it, but we increase the risk of a lung cancer. So, for me, it is essential to know the consequence of doing something...

Where do I start?

There is form and there is content. The form is the physical manifestation of content. The content is made up of a theme, objects or characters and logic. The form is made up of voice, art, costumes, location, sound, musical score, photography and other technical aspects. In this case, there aren’t many limitations of form.

Theme:

A classical good vs. Evil theme! A strong protagonist needs even stronger villain! This story spread across generations, thus increasing the breath for 'form'. Villainy is built up using up not only all social evil but involving paranormal (a lot of scope for special effects team :-)). The more powerful these two characters, the more graphic (blood shed) and explicit (rituals and rapes), things can be depicted. The pretext for FX team is quite solid and convenient for gruesome scenes. Indeed!

Main Characters:

Jejamma: By far the strongest character. She is brave, determined; possess strong conviction, confident, lofty, kind, generous. I did not find any character flaws....
Pasupati: Embodiment of all evil. Perfect villain and a complement to Jejamma…
Jejamma's dad: He is a wimp (who lets his second daughter boss around, while he is still alive and kicking). His reasons not to punish Pasupati are implausible, as Pasupati has already harassed several people before he is married. Everyone in the town knows his son-in-law’s atrocities. To get him to marry his own daughter at the behest of his sister is unfathomable. To top it all, to say, it is because of his daughter's future, he is keeping mum is even more irresponsible. Had he behaved natural (with normal logic), this movie wouldn’t have happened! This character is the weakest and walked on the thin ice.
Satyanarayana, may not have known his mother (Jejamma) that well, as he is shown as a small boy, when she left. It is debatable, as to how he related to his mom..... I am sure; he would have heard legends about his mom, while he grew up. Since, he is deprived of being raised by Jejamma; his admiration for her could be called into question. Certainly, the way, he treats his grand-daughter with respectfulness tickles my bones!
Manorama is a bridge between the generations. Apparently, she has seen both Jejamma and Satyanarayana jr’s relationship. That would make me assume her age to be when she can remember. Say, she is 10 year old (she also claims only she and Jejamma knows what happened 48 days after Aghora’s death). If 80 years have passed since, her age should approximately be 90! Did you notice, she never shows up in the flash back! Probably because, we haven't technologically evolved in animation/SFX to impersonate a younger Manorama J
Arundhati: Another weak character (from the story point of view). This is a result of irrationality of the story. How could Arundhati accept adulation given by elders, if she doesn’t know her place in the Samsthanam’s history? Jejamma has explicitly directed everyone that she is going to be reborn and directed them to first girl by her name. Doesn't she know her direct lineage? How can she not identify the Atman of Satyanarayana’s brother? She conveniently did not, because the logic falls flat and impedes the progress of the movie? If we were to assume that she is bought up oblivious to Samsthanam’s history…..it will put the entire story in logical complications!

Story and Logic:

Haunted House Mystery: History of the abandoned house (particularly, because, it is ‘haunted house’) should not have been a secret. There were a lot of witnesses to what happened when Aghora returned. The Samsthanam is abandoned....as there were a lot of gruesome murders....containment of Aghora and a deadly plague, subsequently. If there is a haunted house, how come Anwar not have a clue about this? There were so many “possession” cases Anwar resolves on a regular basis, stories about Satyanarayana’s brother appearances is also talked about….then, his warnings should also must have been known. As a whole, a thing or two the about the abandoned mansion should have been known.
Aghora’s Revenge: Why would he avenge only Arundhati? How does Aghori know that Jejamma is reborn (or will be born again?)? If he knows that Jejamma by some psychic powers, then why did he not make any attacks as soon as Arundhati is born? How would he know about her marriage? How could Aghora get his human form at the end? What evil did Aghora did in the 80 years? Does he have so much patience? Why did he fail all the years to lure a single person to have him released from the tomb? Is it due to the Satyanarayana’s brother’s atman only? When is he going to get Vimukthi? Didn't anyone try tresspassing into the mansion for 80 years...why only one who seeks his wife (suseela)?
Jejamma’s sacrifice and last days: To end the evil, Jejamma needs to sacrifice....but, there will not be any hurry! Because, it is not in this life that she can to end evil. Hence she could have lived till her first son’s marriage (die, hoping to be reborn to him). Since, she couldn’t have been able to stop anything Aghora must have unleashed. Apparently, after the great plague, Aghora hasn’t done any evil to the people of Gadwal.
Jejamma’s forgotten? Possibly, there would have been a lot of legend/speculation of the reasons why Jejamma never returned? Did the people deem her dead? Do they know Jejamma is leaving then on a sacrificial mission (people certainly behaved as if, she has going on a suicide mission) and forgot her?

Jejamma writes everything...but, why did not she give instructions to her family to educate Arundhati, if born again, that it is indeed her reincarnation? She must also have left these secrets to be shared with her…..because; it should be her mission to end evil. Things like this should be left to chance….it should have been well planned. Alas, it was shown that Jejamma is brave, doesn’t mean that she a great planner J
Killing of Aghora: How did he assume a human form? How does Arundhati know how to kill Aghora? Why did she stab Aghora after stabbing herself (apparently, she did not get the clue from Anwar)? The saint has said this only to Anwar or do we have to tacitly understand even Jejamma knew it?
Some Petty things:
The age of the Saint, who helped Jejamma? If we suppose his age at the time of meeting Jejamma to be 31 (age when Buddha has attained his enlightenment), add another 80? That is a real tough Saint who tests the limits of longevity!
Why did Aghora want Arundhati want her in Gadwal? Why did he not let her cross Gadwal? His power seems to be working nevertheless in Hyderabad where he scared Rahul?
There is always logical problem in creating stories that have not happened (fiction). The logical problems are even more, if we are dealing with non-existing realms. This story is just a classic example of the classic problem of socio-fantasies.
A note about Aghoris: When I was a growing up (early 1980s, when "tulasidalam", a social-fantasy also made a huge splash), I read a novel called "Muudo Purushaardam" by Chivukula Purushottam. He described Aghoris way of living vividly and how other people misunderstand their tenets. He claims them as saints. The wikipedia entry also suggests that this is a sect/cult with only handfuls of them are left in Varanasi. They are not evil doers; it is just that they may have ambivalence to living or dead, human or animal....can't argue too much about it. Demonizing them...saying that they involve in voodoo, witchcraft and sorcery is purely to create dramatic affect in the movie.
Enjoy the movie...but be cautious of accepting what you see. To me, this movie is a pseudo-fantasy thriller. We should reject regressive influences of such movies. I am not saying reject the movie...I am saying do not accept everything you see. Know and be conscious of what you should reject in the movie. Enjoy responsibly! Make no mistake about it...Arundhati is a great ride....still.

All about pulchritude

2008-07-16T17:14:00.000-07:00

I happened to travel to some beautiful places and seen some beautiful things...some creation of man and others by Nature; in the last few months.....it got me contemplating about the nature of beauty.

I realized, there is a bigger perspective to aesthetics than a parochial vision with which generally,"beauty" is put in context. I have also seen a movie which claims to be a real love story, where a protogonist falls for a beautiful girl ( I, for sure, fell in love with the actress....later to find out that the smart Director of the movie, did make a right choice, and married her :-) ). It is so easy to fall in love, be inspired, overpowered, awed by pysical beauty!! If not for Cleopatra's beauty, there wouldn't have been history making wars that altered our history. Some culture's destiny is determined by women's beauty. Men do impossible things falling for women....in the process create Taj Mahals!! However, we are often told that the "inner beauty" is important than the "outer beauty". But the history and precedence seems to point us to a different conclusion. Are they making excuses?? Is that an escapist route to nirvana (for those majority, whose wishes may go unfulfilled)?

Ok, ok, ok......now, please bear with me till I complete what I want to say!

To me, there are three facets to beauty.....physical (god given), the one of the Mind and the one of the Heart. These three beauties are not exclusive by any stretch of imagination......a person generally has some degree of these....right from the most bestowed....to the disgusting......If we just say "yes/no" to each of these beauties, there are 8 ( 2! X 2! X 2!) combinations!! We could do a scaling of 1 to 10 on each of the beauty categories to be more precise......

Let me give some examples that represent each of the beauties :
Physical : Most movie stars, models (Aishwarya Rai, Hrithik Roshan??)
Mind : Noble laureates, pulitzer winners, field medalists and intellectuals (Rabindrnath Tagore, C V Raman, Srinivasa Ramanujan??)
Heart : Nurses, Nuns, People in Love ("with heart ailments" :-) ) ( Mother Theresa, Florence Nitingale, Mahatma Gandhi??)
Another perpective to these categories :

Physical : Be the best one can be to please the eye of others. The better the reach, the better the use of this caracteristic (so, "High Five" for those beautiful Heroins!!)

Heart : Do beautiful things for the people around them. Spread goodwill, tolerance and hope

Mind : Create things that help others lead enriched lives.....Make beautiful things.

The reason why we hear about the "inner beauty", because, that is what is controllable by each individual and compensate for......the easiest to master is that of "heart".....with kindness, compassion, love, forgiveness, faith and spirit....Mind beauty can be compensated to a large extent......with dedication and committment. A lot of researchers fall into this category. Mind and Heart beauty are character attributes. A beautiful mind creates a lot of beautiful things, music, poetry, literature, gadgets (like your new iPhone?), gardens, movies etc., and enrich the way work and live. Who would argue that Beethovan's "Moonlight Sonata" or Da Vinci's "Monolisa" be not admired by several generations to come??

The last one, and the least controllable is "physical" beauty. And guess what?? That's what we try to compensate most for......it could be the most destructive motivator....leading to fights, feuds, wars and much discontent. The reason is every wants to "own" and "possess" beautiful things....where as, the other beauties are all there to be shared and enjoyed. The proper use of a "beauty" is it needs to warm one's soul. I also find it is hard to "love" other beauties easily as well, because it requires a deeper understanding and appreciation of the Heart and the Mind beauty!!

So, what does it all mean? I figured now :

Why "cosmetics" sells better than the "books"!! :-)
Why lot of people fall in Love than the people who do "Charity" or "Voluntary" work!!
Why Miss. Worlds, Universes etc., take up a cause ( not seriously enough, unfortunately :-( )

The Man - Barack Obama

2008-03-26T07:17:00.000-07:00

There are very few occasions in rhetoric and public speaking, like "Gettysberg Address" of Abraham Linclon, "Ask not a country can do for you" by JFK, "I have a dream" or "I see the promised land" by Martin Luthur king, defines what we come to believe and cherish for ages to come. They leave us with most powerful, influential ideas that we carry on through out our lives. In this age of "fast food", these occasions have increasingly become rare. People with courage, ability to take the most difficult issues with honesty and challenge the hipocrisy are almost unheard heard of. Authenticity, ingenuity is all we crave and pray for deliverer.....in the electoral politics. I guess, the search for 'authenticity" is finally over with the man - Barack Obama.

I am particularly impressed with "A more perfect union" speech of him. This is available in youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrp-v2tHaDo&NR=1

I am still soaking into this speech...I do not have enough words to express, my feelings. The speach is stirring, candid, intelligent and high headed..... I am deeply moved!

Barak Obama in real sense is reminds me of the novel written in 1964 by Irwing Wallace's "The Man", where a black president goes through racial prejudice and descrimination, political pressures (impeachement), personal cricises and comes out on top!

Barack Obama is not a black candidate, he is a candidate who is black. He is proving again and again, that is he transcends race with his loftiness, ability to inspire, provide hope and taking a higher road. I hope he will be rewarded presidency for his wisdom and understanding of the complexities of the world. I am sure, that he will capture the imagination of the world, will grow in stature to be a fine stateman.

America, do the right thing, elect your president on merit!! There is a lot at stake : US spremacy as a world power, influence in a multipolar world. Your president should best signify what your country stands for. Prove that you are the country of liberty, unlimited opportunity and a culture of fairness and openness. Prove that you are capable of judging people by the content of their character and not the colour of their skin.

May god bless Obama....

Games Indians Play - a review

2007-12-18T06:34:00.000-08:00

I happened to browse through this book recently. The author puts forward the following about Indians' behavior :
1. low trustworthiness
2. being privately smart and publicly dumb
3. fatalist outlook
4. being too intelligent for our own good
5. abysmal sense of public hygiene
6. lack of self-regulation and sense of fairness
7. reluctance to penalise wrong conduct in others
8. mistaking talk for action
9. deep-rooted corruption and a flair for free-riding
10. inability to follow or implement systems
11. a sense of self-worth that is massaged only if we have the ‘authority’ to break rules
12. propensity to look for loop holes in laws

It will be interesting to read this book. I promise to read and give my impressions.....

Finding Inspiration

2007-12-02T19:46:00.000-08:00

One of the cardinal principles of successful people is their ability to find great mentors or find Inspiration. It reminds me of Eklavya and Drona; but, it is a different line of thought, which I would blog on, later on. I learned from my experience is to find someone who inspires us to achieve bigger and better things in life – a source of constant motivation!! It is not often that we come across people who inspires, motivates and influences us. It is undeniable that we are influenced by our parents, family, friends, teachers and colleagues. We often gets inspired by, often then not, people in public, whom we hardly know (in person)...like a Narayana Murthy, a mother Theresa or a Mahatma Gandhi. The issue here about public icons is; we only "hear" about their great deeds (some of them may be exaggerated) and do not have an opportunity to see their actions in person or experience their greatness. I am fortunate to have seen an near-ordinary person, who sets goals and achieves them!! In the process inspires us to do many "tiny" things each day to fulfill our desires and inch closer to what we want to achieve in our lives.

When I first went to US, there is this guy, whom I have met in Cary, North Carolina in early 1994. I found him to be articulate and incredibly smart. Naturally, I wanted to spend some time with him, learn a few things from him. Fortunately, he was in the same apartment complex that I was staying. At that time, I did not know, he how he would make an impression, that I would carry all my life. In those days, I was very impressed with his academic credentials: A Batchelors degree from elite NIT, Trichy and an MBA from IIM Calcutta!! That was just a start...many people might have much better embellishments. As I learned more about him and his many passions: Help people become rich, his interests in Marathons, Mountaineering, Yoga, Music and public speaking….it was like trying to figure out the depth of an ocean. Most of his interests, to an extent became my passions as well, but haven't pursued with the same zeal as my friend.

I used to see him on the treadmill….diligent and disciplined; practicing at least an hour. I found him to be a super fast "reader" as well. He has been trying to do his MBA from a US university. He got his admission in Duke but he refused. Duke, is a top 5 university and closer to Cary, NC (may be 20 Miles). He told me, he wants to get admitted to the best of the best…..at that time it was Wharton. Given his tenacity, he got it in Wharton the next year. He joined McKinsey (A "cartier" of consulting firms), right after his 2nd MBA. Then, he became Vice President for Nextance. Now, he heads Adsense division at Google ( any takers of a job in Google?)!!

I recently heard that he won a Toastmasters Accolade, deserving so. I have followed his Treks to Mt Kilimanjaro, Mt. Kanchenjunga. His wanderlust has taken him to Mongolia, Gambia and many exotic places….I would like you to share with me a rich canvas of this friend of mine : Gopi Kallayil. There are a few snippets of his life, in the following blogs, articles and an award winning toastmaster presentations…in youtube!!

Following will give you a glimpse of one achiever!!
http://kallayil.com/articles.htm
http://gopi.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN1RifUpi88

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDMXpuh6Npk

Let us set ourselves some goals and follow the path that gives us a sense of accomplishment and happiness.

How to spell "Genui(o)s"?

2007-10-25T19:06:00.000-07:00

Opportunities are dawning on the youth of emerging India like never before.....

But the younger generation, who are getting opportunities (jobs) seems to be so content with landing a job in a BPO or a IT "Big 5", who does mass recruitment....the only pride for these people seems to be "pride" in working for these companies. I once asked a group of these bright kids to spell a word that implies "focussed intelligence and great insight"....they spelled "genious". Then I asked how many people disagree with that spelling, only one girl disagreed. I asked her to give the spelling that she thinks is right, she said "Genius". I again asked the group whether they agree with it. No one agreed. I asked all of them to look into dictionary....lot of them looked puzzled....(probably, they haven't heard of terms like "Dictionary", "Encyclopedia" etc.,) They did anyway (because, I forced).

What I realized is the conviction (rote learning) with which we are trained indicates, how "close" minded we would become! One of the life skills that I realized is "continuous learning". If we are not conditioned for this, we would build a weak nation. For example, it is a common experience that with every monsoon, the roads gets eroded and there will be pot holes....., then right after the monsoon, there will apprently be new layer on the roads ( not new roads). Then, there will be be monsoon, potholes, new layers...the cycle continues...endlesslessly. Do we all agree, this is a healthy cycle? Do we think this cycle can be broken? Why we do not do what we know? One reason I think is due to our "conditioning" of lack of "continous learning" and "continous improvement" mindset. I am not pointing to one set of people, it is across all sections of the social groups.

Hmmm...who worries about all this, we will import "Road laying" technology from Germany(if at all a crisis arise), because we are a super power and we have zillion trillionaires in our country!! After all, our core competency is "software support and maintenance" and all our engineers are doing a fabulous job at it.

Truth transcends emotions

2007-10-21T00:15:00.000-07:00

In a world we live in, where there is a lot of social, political and econimic conditioning, propoganda, we often give in to notions and cliche's. Often we consider these notions as "laws". The rules of thumbs would be considered reality.

Some examples of this thinking is :

1. Real Estate prices always increases ( Truth : It is a market and subjected to ups and downs)

2. We have to "work hard" for money (Truth: "work smart" and create value to become rich)

3. Eating Bitter gourd, Fenugreek will reduce diabetes!! ( Does it? Were there any scientific evidence?)

4. "You will die if you eat snake gourd with eggs" ( I must have died several times over!!)

5. India is the greatest country ( the assumption is all other countries are not as good). ( Really?)

and many, many more!

Most of these arise, in my understanding that we are emotionally attached a notion that reinforces our deep rooted "insecurities". But, these could be understood in the context of, "feel good" factor. It often is not necessary to rely "unfounded" facts to "feel good". Even if we can accept the "truth", which again is subjective, we can be happy knowing that we have learned something about ourselves, thus achieving one step closer to knowing our true selves...good, or bad or ugly. Accepting the very "truth" is the first step towards achieving "nirvana".

To glorify ones' legacy need not result in putting down other achievements. Once we have the openness, we would achieve and scale bigger heights as human beings.

Symbiosis in Human interactions

2007-10-20T22:11:00.000-07:00

In the very first blog, I have spoken about "collaboration". "Symbiosis" is a related term which means "living together of unlike Organisms". When applied to people, everyone is unique, but we live in communities, sometime asserting "Individuality", sometimes coming together as "brethren".

In management parlance, the relationships between two parties are classified as:

Win/Win : Both Parties win (Mutually beneficial Relationship)
Win/Lose : One party wins, the other loses (Exploitative Relationship)
Lose/Lose : Both are parties lose (Total productivity, Net-Net gain is negative, hence deemed that fatal for the ecosystem )

But, when I recently chanced upon "Symbiosis" while checking out a Biology textbook, I thought another dimension needs to be added to qualify relationships....based on the outcomes. Here they are :
Mutualism : Any relationship between individuals where both individuals derive a benefit.
Commensalism : A relationship between two living organisms where one benefits and the other is not significantly harmed or helped
Parasitism : A relationship is one in which one member of the association benefits while the other is harmed.

Mutualism can be attributed to a Win/Win relationship and Parasitism can be attributed to Win/Lose scenarios. The dimensions that can not be mapped directly are Commensalism and Lose/Lose. In Biology, Lose/Lose is not discussed because, it can not exist, if an ecology needs to survive. Lose/Lose unique to Human relationships ( because of developed intelligence and ego).

Commensalism is also unique to Biological world, if it were to be translated to the human relationship, the benefactor needs to be a Saint or a Philanthropist. In a world where deprivation and "abundance mindset is in short supply, commensalism is a distant thought in general Human relationships.

But, understanding of these two realms also gives us a sense of how we need to evolve in harmony with Nature.

Ramayana and Mahabharata Vs Science

2007-09-13T09:24:00.000-07:00

Generally, I do not comment on the controversial topics such as this. But after reading reports on the Ram Sethu and the passions it arose, I just couldn't resist saying something.

How do we know if Ramayana or Mahabharata happened?? How would Archeologists and anthropologists establish historicity of the same?

First, we, in India culturally, very inept in documenting any historical happenings and generally passed on orally (our mechanism of secrecy and protection of Intellectual Property). So, there is no knowing of what is actually said, and interpreted by future generations. Actually, what is told as a story could have happened millenia ago as passed on...

We all know about "Chinese whispers". We could all generally agree, that any story ever told either reflects our dreams, aspirations, inspiration from a fact or collation of all the above. The stories are aimed at entertaining, entralling, inspiring awe for some fantastic, often exaggarated events. For example, almost all the civilizations, in one form or the other spoke about flying machines or fantastic creatures such as Dragons or Phoenix reflecting their aspirations and a sense of fantasy. Hence, some of the events would have happened, may not necessary as a single story in series (that means the story might have been strung together with various fascinating events at different points of time), the stories would have been enhanced, dramatized and fine tuned as the thought progressed. So, the progression might have been, an event becoming a stories, stories embellished to become legends, Legends becoming myths... Natually, since, the stories have evolved over time, they may also reflect the cultural aspects and realities of those times.

The second perspective is scientific, for every conclusion, there needs to be some material evidence. Say for example, when we say, dinosaurs existed and perished about a 65 Million years ago in the Jurassic period, first of all, we need to establish the existence of these creatures (which is done by the skeletal remains and fossils), Their age needs to be determined (by carbon dating or DNA evidence). Then the next challenge is to prove that they were extinct...for which, initially, there would be a set of hypotheses (like epidemic, hit by a comet, earth quakes etc.,) and one by one, the options will be eliminated based on the evidence collected. All these are done based on inference, circumstantial and material evidence.....

What is surprising in Ram Sethu theory is all the numbers projected in the media seems to be a little challenging to put together a timeline. According to Hindu Vedic tradition, there are 4 eons which are Krita 1,728,000 years Before Now (BN) , Treta 1,296,000 years BN , Dwapara 864,000 BN and Kaliyuga started 432,000 BN. Ramayana happened in Threta Yuga. Some eminent vedic pundits and scholars put Threta Yuga as 1.7Million years (placing it of the advent of "Homo" species particularly, Homo Habilis). Mysteriously, they were only a species separate from other Humunids. Is this the reason why, in Ramayana, Humans (sapiens) and Vanara (primates) who belong to same Genus, communicate and mingle freely with each other?? This is a very plausible theory and is widely quoted in the Analysis of Vedic Scholars. The same reasoning is applied by Hindu scholars to date the formation of Ram sethu aka Adams Bridge, whose formation dates back to about the same time...

Pundits have used Scientific reasoning to substantiate the age of the Adams bridge. Should Vedic scholar's numbers reconcile scientifically, they have to peg the Mathsyavataram / Kurmavataram at 360 Million years (well before the age of Dinosaurs). It is claimed that Bharatam happened 50 generations later. This means Bharata (Which is Dwapara Yuga) has happened 2500 years after Ramayana (if each generation is 50 years). Hence, in best case scenario, both these epics should have happened in a span of 2500 years. If an epoch such as Yuga is say, 50-100 generations, then each Yuga may not be a fraction of Million years!! So, there is only so much reconciliation we could do with a religious claim.

Now, coming to scientific calculations.... Let us start with a brief story of life on earth. Single celled organisms called "Archaean" started in sea 4600 Million years in sea and an Amphibian life with "Carboneferous" started 360 Million years ago. If the theory of evolution and all the support for Human evolution that needs to be considered, first human was known as " Australopithecus afarensis" lived in North Africa about 3 Million years ago. It is generally believed man's hominid ancestors did not leave their African home until about two million years ago. There is, no evidence of a human presence in the Indian subcontinent before roughly 250,000 to 300,000 years ago(Did Threta yuga happened before the Human ever appeared on the continent?).. It is scientifically agreed that the "Fire" is discovered by Homo sapiens only about 20,000 years ago. The earliest known civilization is "Chinese", which happened to be called "Neolithic" or Stone age that occurred 8000 - 3700 years ago. The societies evolved, literature, medicine evolved. So, all that we know "Archeologically" about our Human civilization can only be reliably cover or history to the last 20,000 years. Anything beyond is a realm of mythology and speculation!!

Given the advances and society described in Ramayana/Mahabharata, we can reasonably sure that the societies are well formed and we can nail them, at best to have occurred from 5000 - 2000 years ago (based on the culture, society, science and astronomy, political scenario). For example, when we read descriptions of stories about castles, it tells us some engineering, architectural thoughts and principles. All the "anthropological" history with Sword making, Jewelry means, metallurgical advances etc., deals in the last 6000-3000 years. Even Harappan and Indus valley civilization of ancient India is estimated as 5000 years old. Even if Rama predated this age, it could not have been more than 8000 years old (oldest known Chinese stone age) or for benefits sake, make it 10K years old!!

If we accept the above, Adams bridge could not have been constructed by Human by no stretch of imagination (at least with the knowledge and means at his disposal during that time), but it can be conclusively said, it is "God" constructed, before human ever appeared on the Indain subcontinent and is, most likely 1.7 Million years old..as claimed. Vedic scholars have apparently has a lot of ground to cover (actually, there is no need) to rationalize the mythological events with the Hindu eons and archeological/ antropological progression. Trying to retrofit science to Vedas is next to impossible and isn't rational. The two realms are different. One is fantasy another is established science. Religion and mythology transcends reality and should hold its place nevertheless. Hence, the debate to mix and match, trying to prove "science" in mythological stories and epics will be a futile exercise.

To prove historicity of Rama will be as difficult as establishing the existence of God. Whether Rama existed or not is a mute question, as he is present in the deep conscience of the faithful. Sometimes, we will have to just go by leap of faith and and respect the sentiments of majority of the people. But, by knowing the facts and giving a rational thinking will help us make conscious choice rather than giving in to passion or emotion.

Why should we fail?

2007-06-16T20:13:00.000-07:00

Let us muse on a few things like :

What do we do in order to consider failure a stepping stone?
Why do wise people say failure to be essential for eventual success?
Will Knowledge reduce the affect of the fear...?
What events in our life triggers fear?
How do we unconventionally conquer any fear??

One of the most enduring sayings that is used again and again is "failure" to be stepping stone for success. What is success? With out giving a complicated definition is : success is achieving a goal we have set out for ourselves. Actually, success is not determined by any other person other than ourselves.

We meet again soon. Till next time.....suspense!

Dynamics of Stimulus and Response

2006-08-09T19:11:00.000-07:00

It is often mentioned in Bhagavadgita, the virtue of patience, control of senses as the epitome of an "evolved" soul. In the past, I was looking for a job opportunity. The opportunities were rare. I had to do quite a bit of networking and relationship building to get the position that met my role ( which I am very selective) expectations.

I have started the dialog with the senior leadership of the potential employer....and took the discussions forward. The offer was made, which was way below my expectation. Upon the receipt of the offer, I was let down, disappointed and angry. I intended to send the following reply to the senior leader this way :

Dear Mr. So&So,
I am sure, you remember when I contacted you directly in good faith and started dialogue in earnest for the last 6 months. I would not have, if not for great professional respect for you and confidence in my own ability to exceed any of your expectations at that level.
Last week I have received an offer from your HR (attached). It seems someone else's offer came to me. It is far below my expectations on all fronts.
I thank you for your engagement during this period and am hopeful that I will have future opportunities to work in your elite team.
Best regards,
Surya Putchala

After drafting the mail above, I have given a "cool down" period of a day and I have rephrased the response given below:

Dear So&So,
I really appreciate you for spending time in considering me in your team.
I am sure, you remember when I contacted you directlyin good faith and started dialogue in earnest. I wouldnot have, if not for great confidence in my ownability to exceed any of your expectations at that level.
I have received the offer. It is far below myexpectations on all fronts. I sincerely believe, it is due to some mis-communication.
I am hopeful that I will be right-positioned even if it means re-evaluation, discussions and time.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Best regards,
Surya Putchala

Naturally, the first mail would have bought the issue to a closure and burnt a bridge, which took sometime to build. The mail I sent evoked a surprising response....from the top and the company reverted with a better offer!!

Here goes a lesson on what a restraint of our anger could do. People would provoke us into doing things that may not be beneficial to either. But, with little restraint and rethink, we can respond to a stimulus for a better result!!

How to overcome Fear of Failure

2006-04-05T21:42:00.000-07:00

In this blog, let us explore and learn something about "Fear".

Pondering questions like:
What is fear?
What do we fear?
What is a failure?
Why do we fear failure?
may yield some ideas that, to me are very interesting.

I am neither a psychologist nor a philosopher, but what I found is when we think and ruminate on issue such as above, we get surprisingly interesting hypotheses...and may be some practical conclusions based of the introspection. Being objective, logical and looking an issue from different perspectives could yield a lot of further insight.

Fear is defined in the dictionary.com as a distressing emotion aroused by impending danger, evil, pain, etc., whether the threat is real or imagined; the feeling or condition of being afraid. One of the keys in that definition is "real" or "imagined". There are a few studies that indicated that the 85% of the fear events we worry about never come true....

Now coming to defining failure, I am not going to quote from dictionary, but use a simple definition we all know. Failure is a state not been able to attaining the goal we have set our ourselves, however small it is. If I set a goal saying "wake up early in the morning at 5:00 am" everyday, and if I wake up at 5:15 am, then it is a failure....hence, certain failures are trivial and certain failures are high impact and deeply affecting.

That said, let us get back to the core theme, we are exploring.

While I was hearing NPR recently in US, there was a discussion on the fears of Americans. Can you guess?? Alright, alright, you may not have guessed it!! They fear "public speaking" followed by "death"......how unexpected?

I fear a lot of things. Amongst which, death is something which is pre-ordained. Since, with the occurrence of death, I don't exist, let us not explore fear of "death' any further........

I believe, any other fear can be overcome. I have successfully conquered "public speaking" fear recently.....This fear has stopped me from achieving my passion of being able to influence wide audience, in the past. There were times when, I my knees were week and butterflies in the stomach, the moment I saw a group of people and my lips would dry up. It was an awful feeling. I was repeatedly making fool of myself through gaffes. I could hear disparaging smiles in the audience....Can any experience, so awful?

I contended there were two reasons :
1. There was tremendous "self-consciousness" when I stood before them...mostly related to how I appeared and how I sound. What they would think of me? Do I sound stupid? Will they find faults with me?
2. I am not very confident of the subject I was dealing with.

The first reason is debilitating are related the the "self-image" I was carrying. The focus and attention is all on what other people would think and perceive about me : my looks, intelligence, knowledge etc., so worried about their judgment of me rather than my own "comfort" of doing a specific task and enjoy doing it.

Thinking of the second reason, if I were to stand before a naive audience, I have observed, I could do much better than that of an erudite audience. It made me conclude that, the more knowledge and deeper understanding I have on the subject I was articulating, lesser the fear. I also found that Knowledge is the antidote of fear. I come from and IT background. I found my My confidence levels higher when addressing IT departments when compared to functional departments. I could relate better to a CIO rather than an CFO.

So, what are some of the things we need to overcome a certain fear? These are some steps I could think of :
1. Identify what we get frightened with
2. Think about why we fear it? What are the conseuences of having that fear.
3. Willingness to conquer that fear?
4. Courage to fail several times conquering the that fear

I can vouch that conquering a fear gives you enormous joy and a sense of achievement.

I will stop this blog for the time being, but revisit this this theme a little later..... Not only will I discuss and explore many broad questions related to fear and failure, but also I will share with you my personal experiences that have helped me tremendously facing C-level Executives...in my profession. Thanks to a group of 35 friends who helped me reinforce belief in myself....

Criticism - a god's gift?

2006-04-05T21:28:00.000-07:00

One of the challenges in our lives is to handle criticism. I have scuttled a lot of actions and decisions for the fear of drawing criticism from friends and family. Some of them I regret to this day. In the retrospect, I should acted more assertively and have made those painful decisions for my own sake. I believe "handling criticism" is an essential life skill that every one needs to learn. For, we all, at one time or the other, will be criticized for any action or decision we may take or do. It is, indeed painful to know that others misunderstand us or use less than flattering words about us or even disapprove our actions.

So, why would it hurt, should someone doesn't approve of our actions or decisions? I think, it is because of two reasons :
1. We give the others so much power to hurt us
2. We are unsure about ourselves.

I believe that anything that is said about us that goes against our own "self-image" is not taken well by us. Hence, how should we handle criticism and Feedback?

Let us also be cognizant that all major religions of the world beseech, "Know thyself"; implying our ultimate goal is to find-out what we are all about : Our weaknesses, strengths, values and beliefs.

The approaches to the self should be built on solid foundation of
1. Self- Introspection
2. Self-awareness and Conciousness
3. Receiveing Criticism
4. Seeking Feedback

Even a thief, a cheat, a murderer thinks that he is good and all the problems lie outside of himself......his family, community, world at large. We often see people blaming everything in sight. Hence, we are generally, insensitive to our own "contribution" to the overall situation.

Self-Introspection....as suggested by Mahatma Gandhi is a prerequisite in building our character. It is a foundation of "self-knowledge". But it is only limited because, we can potentially only know a little of a bigger picture of "ourselves". Hence, there needs to be a mechanism to gauge our actions not just with our own perspective and wisdom alone.

I came across a very good tool called Johari Window. This tool captures what others know about us as well as what we know about ourselves. When I did this excercise a few years ago, I realized how much I didn't know about myself that others knew.

Then there is a tough nut called "Criticism".

It comes in two flavors : From Within and one from outside.

The one that happens within needs to be answered by all means. We need to stay clear with our own conscience. I suggest, even if you commit a bad act ( what society believes that act to be), do it with conviction and be answerable to your self!! That means, your thought, talk and action are in harmony. The problem araises if these three are misaligned and a feeling of guilt festers in our heart. So, we should first, be answerable for ourselves before we answer anyone else in the world. Simple, huh?

We are often traumatized by what others think of us. Of all the above, being criticized is the most difficult to handle. Following are some of my thoughts on how to handle them ( and as suggested in my earlier blogs, "self-talk"):

I consider this a boon.... The giver can have two intensions : Our well being or to hurt us......In the case of his intent to hurt, we will have to consider and intropect and "self" criticize ourselves to see if there is truth in what is said. If there is, we put a change plan around the aspect that is been come to the fore....Hey, here is now we are one weakness less!! He is actually, helped us :-). So his purpose to hurt us is completely defeated!! If it is critique, it is anyway, meant to help us become better person.

Feedback is what you get either you have sought or unsolicited.....Since we have asked for it, it is our responsibility to take it seriously are improve upon!!

So much for a simple matter of "Criticism" :-)

Impediments to sharing

2006-03-04T22:01:00.000-08:00

I do not have to even say or mention much cliche'd "life is a two way street". Some people say life is give and take.

There is another concept I have learned in the west that says " what goes around come around". I have experienced and validate the same in my life. When I respected people, I got respected. when I hated a person, I got it back ( although there is a time lapse between giving and getting).

What are all the above got to do with "Sharing"? The cardinal rule says, "You will be shared, only if you share".

The essential things about sharing are :
1. We must have that resource in abundance for us to be able to share.
2. We can only share things that we have. What we don't have, we can't give
3. Our own security of the resource that is being shared.

I consider "feeling of security" as a big factor inpeding our ability to share. Unless we overcome these internal demons, we will not be able to overcome being "competitive". It is also important that we keep the above points in mind, intropect, and "self-talk".

I wanted to experiment with the knowledge giving and test if I get the knowledge back in return. I can't but excited to share one of my learning experience. . I have recently taught a class on the topics I have a lot of experience and knowlege. As I was articulating my thoughts, I have formed new insights and the questions from the audience have given me new dimensions and clarity to my knowlege!! My experience with sharing has been marvellously helpful for enhancing my own thought process. So, by sharing my knowledge, I improved myself, didn't I? I have been validated, verified and improved by a collective intellect, rather than my own!! Is there any other secret, more powerful than this - "Collective Intellect"?

We often get mixed up between "Collaboration" and "Competition", competition is based on the premise that in order for us to win, some others should lose. It may make sense in a environment with limited resources. We have now come to a world where the possibilities are limitless and the opportunities are abound. There is Abundance everywhere...it is all are in our thought process.

Collaborating for Success

2006-02-25T02:17:00.000-08:00

"Collaboration", for me means a lot. Some insights have dawned on me last year and it is one of the basics, I should have mastered earlier in my career for achieving greater hieghts.

In the corporate life, we are repeatedly insisted on collobaration and how it will increase the effectiveness of individuals, teams, groups and eventually an organization. Multitudes of collaboration tools including, net meetings, chats, e-mails etc., are all ubiquitous at any workplace. This is to enable individuals to collaborate and share more and more.....

It sounds commonsensical that we collaborate. But, is it easy for people to collobarate at an indivual level? Does it come naturally to us to collaborate and share? On a little comtemplation, it occured to me, that it is easier to claim we collaborate than really do. The next question is why then, is it so difficult for many people to share knowledge and collaborate?

All through our childhood, we are asked and encouraged to excel individually ( more so in western countries than in east). In this tough competitive environment, we trained all our lives to compete individually. We are taught to be "Independent". We celebrate "success" for individual accomplishments. We get jobs based on our individual exploits and talents. Hence, the brain is hardwired to excel individually.

Given the pervasiveness of this thought process and the 'cultural' underpinnings, can we expect people to take a "u-turn" and start becoming a "team player" and "collaborate" just soon after they start being in teams? Can all people become Individual Contributors?

It is beyond any doubt, that global economy works on the principles of "synergies" and "free trade" which are intrinsically based on "collaboration". Thus, in working life, the skills of teamwork and collaboration needs to be relearnt. Whoever accepts that collaboration is the only way to succeed, will relearn this critical skill and have a successful career.

In the next blog I will explore a "self" thinking process to help individuals becoming more "team" oriented.

So long .......